Skip to content
Massage.
Physiology of massageDraft

Pain, the pain gate and the nervous system

Touch and pressure change how the nervous system processes pain signals, which may help explain the short-term pain relief people report after massage.

Evidence
limited

Reviews show short-term pain relief compared with no treatment, but the certainty is low (Cochrane rated low-back-pain evidence as low to very low; an evidence map of 49 reviews found mostly low-strength evidence). Benefits over sham or active treatments are small. The gate control theory is a useful model, but it is outdated in detail and no study has shown it is the specific reason massage helps.

Effects

  • Short-term reduction in reported pain after massage, compared with no treatment
  • Smaller short-term benefits compared with sham or other active treatments
  • Pleasant touch competing with pain signals, so pain feels less intense during and just after massage
  • Benefits for pain generally fade within weeks rather than lasting long term

Pain is produced by the nervous system

Pain is not a direct readout of tissue damage. Sensors in the tissues send signals up the spinal cord, and the brain decides how much of a threat they represent, taking into account context, mood, past experience and expectations. That is why the same sensation can hurt more when you are stressed and less when you feel safe. The unit Apply principles of pain neuroscience covers these principles of pain neuroscience.

The pain gate

In 1965, Melzack and Wall proposed the gate control theory. In simple terms:

  • Signals from touch and pressure travel on large, fast nerve fibres.
  • Pain signals travel on smaller, slower fibres.
  • Both meet in the spinal cord, where touch input can “close the gate” and reduce how much pain signal passes up to the brain.
  • The brain can also send signals down to open or close the gate.

This is why rubbing a bumped elbow helps. Researchers now agree the original wiring diagram is not correct in detail, but its main idea still holds: pain is modulated in the spinal cord and by the brain, and touch is one input that can turn it down.

How this relates to massage

A current model of manual therapy suggests the mechanical input starts a chain of nervous-system responses, both in the spinal cord and in the brain (including relaxation, expectation and the therapeutic relationship), that together produce the pain relief. This is more likely than the idea that massage physically “fixes” tissues.

What the reviews show:

  • Compared with no treatment, massage reduces reported pain in the short term.
  • Compared with sham or other active treatments, benefits are small.
  • Effects mostly fade over weeks. Confidence in the findings is low because trials are small and hard to blind.

Practical points

  • Slow, comfortable pressure that the client can relax into is more useful than pressure they have to brace against (see Pressure scale and check-ins).
  • Avoid threatening language like “your back is out” or “this is really damaged.” Reassuring language helps the nervous system settle.
  • Describe massage as something that can help people feel better and move more comfortably for a while, not as a cure for a painful condition.

Related: Relaxation and the parasympathetic response, Psychological effects of massage.

Sources

  1. Melzack R, Wall PD (1965). Pain mechanisms: a new theory. Science 150(3699):971–979
  2. Mendell LM (2014). Constructing and deconstructing the gate theory of pain. Pain 155(2):210–216 (The model is not correct in detail but transformed understanding of pain.)
  3. Bialosky JE et al. (2009). The mechanisms of manual therapy in the treatment of musculoskeletal pain: a comprehensive model. Man Ther 14(5):531–538
  4. Furlan AD et al. (2015). Massage for low-back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (9):CD001929
  5. Crawford C et al. (2016). The impact of massage therapy on function in pain populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs, Part I. Pain Med 17(7):1353–1375
  6. Miake-Lye IM et al. (2019). Massage for pain: an evidence map. J Altern Complement Med 25(5):475–502